diff --git a/public/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/poa/index.md b/public/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/poa/index.md index 8c65cd1df89..0c3ef109b18 100644 --- a/public/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/poa/index.md +++ b/public/content/developers/docs/consensus-mechanisms/poa/index.md @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ In a Proof-of-Authority (PoA) network, if for example there are 10 authorized si | Pros | Cons | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -| Scalable more than other popular mechanisms such POS and POW, as it's based on a limited number of block signers | PoA networks typically have a relatively small number of validating nodes. This makes a PoA network more centralized. | +| Scalable more than other popular mechanisms such PoS and PoW, as it's based on a limited number of block signers | PoA networks typically have a relatively small number of validating nodes. This makes a PoA network more centralized. | | PoA blockchains are incredibly cheap to run and maintain | becoming an authorized signer is typically out of reach for an ordinary person, because the blockchain requires entities with established reputation. | | The transactions are confirmed very quick as it could reach less than 1 second because only limited number of signers are required to validate new blocks | malicious signers could reorg, double spend, censor transactions in the network, those attacks are mitigated but still possible |