You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems like DYN could not issue any hash request, and also not have an associated END, since we're only hashing dummy values? So DYN would still populate the block hash table, but have no other effect on the trace.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Also, I believe DYN could be made an operation that is included in basic blocks then?
In #1091, we need the decoder helper registers to save the word loaded from memory (for the chiplets bus and block hash table). However, technically, since DYN is currently a control block, we shouldn't be using its helper registers.
Exactly. We will basically save 8 hasher chiplet rows per DYN (and 1 main trace row from not having a corresponding END)
Makes sense. One other thing we can try to do in the future is to use multiplicities somehow in the hasher chiplet so that we would not need to have a trace for computing the same hash more than once.
I believe DYN could be made an operation that is included in basic blocks then?
This would be tricky as basic blocks don't have children and DYN could invoke an arbitrary block (e..g, a JOIN block). So, we'd need to end the current basic block, then execute the dynamic block, and then execute the rest basic block - but this would be basically the same thing as having DYN be its own node (i.e., not in basic block).
Originally posted by @plafer in #1516 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: