Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vulnerable shared libraries might make 180protocol vulnerable. Can you help upgrade to patch versions? #50

Open
HelenParr opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@HelenParr
Copy link

Hi, @parthbond180 , @hiteshvpatel256 , I'd like to report a vulnerability issue in com.protocol180:protocol-aggregator-workflows:0.1.4.

Issue Description

com.protocol180:protocol-aggregator-workflows:0.1.4 directly or transitively depends on 4 C libraries (.so). However, I noticed that one C libraries is vulnerable, containing the following CVEs:
libcrypto.so from C project openssl(version:1.1.1) exposed 9 vulnerabilities:
CVE-2021-3711, CVE-2021-3712, CVE-2019-1549, CVE-2019-1543, CVE-2018-0735, CVE-2020-7043, CVE-2020-7042, CVE-2020-7041, CVE-2019-1552

Suggested Vulnerability Patch Versions

openssl has fixed the vulnerabilities in versions >=1.1.1l

Java build tools cannot report vulnerable C libraries, which may induce potential security issues to many downstream Java projects.
Could you please upgrade the above shared libraries to their patch versions?

Thanks for your help~
Best regards,
Helen Perr

@parthbond180
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

Thanks for raising this issue.

Openssl is being used by Conclave (version 1.2.1) toolkit for signing the hardware enclave with an RSA key. As of now, com.protocol180:protocol-aggregator-workflows:0.1.4 has a dependency on Conclave 1.2.1 to build the enclave for both release & simulation mode.

As you mention on the issue, openssl version greater than 1.1.1 will resolve the vulnerabilities, so we are also hoping for upgrades of openssl version from R3 Conclave in their next release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants