You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Posting this one as a feedback topic on behalf of Nick (@nicdc), who posted it originally over here.
So as the title mentions, his data is single-shell at b=1300, with 60 gradient directions and a single b=0.
He also mentioned:
...standard ... single-shell pipeline plus eddy outlier replacement, slice to volume correction, and unwarping with fieldmaps (using FSL epi_reg).
This is what the b=0 image looked like, before and after preprocessing respectively:
Note the intensity windowing here is (automatically) min-max'ed, which explains the "darker" image on the right. Other than that, @nicdc, I note that you mentioned unwarping with fieldmaps... however, I've flicked back and forth between these two images (thanks for using the same FOV in the original screenshots; that made this far easier for me), and I didn't see much spatial warping, if even any. Are you sure this is before/after the steps that included this unwarping? I can see though that denoising and/or unringing likely took place, due to the introduction of some negative intensities (which I noticed via the windowing actually). Generally, this all looks good, even though I've got the feeling the fieldmaps didn't have much impact.
So well, the final SS3T-CSD result itself on these data then looked as follows, for the (absolute) WM-like, GM-like and CSF-like compartments respectively:
There's not much to say here, other than that this looks absolutely excellent for this type of data and data quality! 👍 👍 All in line with the other feedback provided by others here for similarly low b-value data. You might still want to run mtnormalise on this result, if you haven't done so yet; I think I'm still spotting a minor bias field / intensity inhomogeneity effect in there.
Thanks this piece of feedback; another successful and beautiful result to add to the list! 🙂
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Posting this one as a feedback topic on behalf of Nick (@nicdc), who posted it originally over here.
So as the title mentions, his data is single-shell at b=1300, with 60 gradient directions and a single b=0.
He also mentioned:
This is what the b=0 image looked like, before and after preprocessing respectively:
Note the intensity windowing here is (automatically) min-max'ed, which explains the "darker" image on the right. Other than that, @nicdc, I note that you mentioned unwarping with fieldmaps... however, I've flicked back and forth between these two images (thanks for using the same FOV in the original screenshots; that made this far easier for me), and I didn't see much spatial warping, if even any. Are you sure this is before/after the steps that included this unwarping? I can see though that denoising and/or unringing likely took place, due to the introduction of some negative intensities (which I noticed via the windowing actually). Generally, this all looks good, even though I've got the feeling the fieldmaps didn't have much impact.
So well, the final SS3T-CSD result itself on these data then looked as follows, for the (absolute) WM-like, GM-like and CSF-like compartments respectively:
There's not much to say here, other than that this looks absolutely excellent for this type of data and data quality! 👍 👍 All in line with the other feedback provided by others here for similarly low b-value data. You might still want to run
mtnormalise
on this result, if you haven't done so yet; I think I'm still spotting a minor bias field / intensity inhomogeneity effect in there.Thanks this piece of feedback; another successful and beautiful result to add to the list! 🙂
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: