You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently https://github.com/9tigerio/db2rest/blob/master/rdbms-support/src/main/java/com/homihq/db2rest/jdbc/sql/MetaDataExtraction.java#L70 TABLE & VIEW schema object types are supported.
If a connected DB got a partitioned table, that gets filtered out, so one can see specific partitions (not the partitioned table itself). It's possible to access the data of a specific partition, but a instrumentation via partitioned table object seems like a 'more natural' option.
Is it OK by product owner(s) to extend types list (make it configurable via property ...)?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Currently https://github.com/9tigerio/db2rest/blob/master/rdbms-support/src/main/java/com/homihq/db2rest/jdbc/sql/MetaDataExtraction.java#L70 TABLE & VIEW schema object types are supported.
If a connected DB got a partitioned table, that gets filtered out, so one can see specific partitions (not the partitioned table itself). It's possible to access the data of a specific partition, but a instrumentation via partitioned table object seems like a 'more natural' option.
Is it OK by product owner(s) to extend types list (make it configurable via property ...)?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions