We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The baseline analysis choice is (currently): T_X = ACT+Planck tSZ deprojected T_Y = ACT+Planck kappa ~ asymmetric grad(T_X)T_Y+grad(T_Y)T_X coadded with all other non-TT estimators involving T_Y, E_act, B_act lmin = 100 lmax_T = 3000 lmax_P = 5000
We will run this on simulations either from Sehgal et al or WebSky with and without tSZ+kSZ+CIB, and show what the bias is, if any.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You can also subtract out a CIB map for Planck by scaling e.g. the 545 GHz map
Sorry, something went wrong.
Also, worth finding out what is the timescale for getting tSZ and CIB maps from Buzzard (instead of using Websky/ Sehgal)
No branches or pull requests
The baseline analysis choice is (currently):
T_X = ACT+Planck tSZ deprojected
T_Y = ACT+Planck
kappa ~ asymmetric grad(T_X)T_Y+grad(T_Y)T_X coadded with all other non-TT estimators involving T_Y, E_act, B_act
lmin = 100
lmax_T = 3000
lmax_P = 5000
We will run this on simulations either from Sehgal et al or WebSky with and without tSZ+kSZ+CIB, and show what the bias is, if any.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: