Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should a rule without a definition default to itself? #51

Open
AKQuaternion opened this issue Apr 29, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Should a rule without a definition default to itself? #51

AKQuaternion opened this issue Apr 29, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
discuss Something to talk about

Comments

@AKQuaternion
Copy link
Owner

Right now we often say things like "invis : invis" or "forward : forward" or "G : G", maybe we should just put those rules in if they're not listed. On the other hand, there is a conceivable meaning for a rule that disappears when expanded, it will still draw at the lowest level.

@AKQuaternion AKQuaternion added the discuss Something to talk about label Apr 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discuss Something to talk about
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant