Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Empirical timesleep is not enough #12

Open
jordiandreu opened this issue Apr 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Empirical timesleep is not enough #12

jordiandreu opened this issue Apr 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@jordiandreu
Copy link
Contributor

I find out that the empirical time sleep value used when preparing the detector saving parameters is not enough and does not guarantee the correct configuration in random circumstances.

@jordiandreu jordiandreu added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 19, 2021
@jordiandreu
Copy link
Contributor Author

As a workaround, the delay time needed in the configuration logic has been exposed as a controller property in order to facilitate the fine tuning of this value. However, this issue should be kept open until a final solution is found.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant