From 185ab28a89aa1b952cdc36b1a0d53fa8826b2973 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: liauzhanyi Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:56:25 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo in UG --- docs/UserGuide.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/UserGuide.md b/docs/UserGuide.md index 1e88236ad64..2aedebb10fe 100644 --- a/docs/UserGuide.md +++ b/docs/UserGuide.md @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ _Details coming soon ..._ - First of all, we consider a duplicate as a person having both identical name (case-insensitive) and phone number. - To understand this, we look at the following cases and explain why they should not be considered a duplicate. - Persons with the same name but different phone numbers are common, and are clearly not duplicates. -- Persons with different names but the same phone number can exist in the field of social work, and should not be considered duplicates. If multiple beneficiaries live in the same shared rental flat, they may share the same phone number (on a landline). For the social worker to remember each person's contact separately, it makes sense to not mark these contacts as duplicates so that remarks and tags can be added to each person's contact. +- Persons with different names but the same phone number can exist in the field of social work, and should not be considered duplicates. If multiple beneficiaries live in the same shared rental flat, they may share the same phone number (on a landline). For the social worker to remember each person's contact separately, it makes sense to not mark these contacts as duplicates so that remarks and tags can be added to each person's contact. - Persons with different names and different phone numbers are definitely different people, and are thus not duplicates. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------