Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PE-D][Tester D] Overzealous input validation for tag #270

Open
soc-se-bot opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[PE-D][Tester D] Overzealous input validation for tag #270

soc-se-bot opened this issue Nov 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
response.PlannedEnhancement severity.Low A flaw that is unlikely to affect normal operations of the product. type.FeatureFlaw Some functionality missing from a feature delivered in a way that the feature becomes less useful.
Milestone

Comments

@soc-se-bot
Copy link

The current input validation for the tag field in the add command is as follows:

Study group names should only contain alphanumeric characters and dashes

This is a blocking operation and might potentially be considered overzealous input validation because users might want to be able to have their own system for tagging (having spaces, punctuation etc.)

If there is a implementation constraint (e.g. too long tags causing hindrance to software), having input length validation could potentially be used instead. Alternatively, warnings can be given (instead of being blocking).


Labels: severity.Low type.FeatureFlaw
original: juliantayyc/ped#4

@wkxcass wkxcass added severity.Low A flaw that is unlikely to affect normal operations of the product. response.Accepted A valid bug. type.FeatureFlaw Some functionality missing from a feature delivered in a way that the feature becomes less useful. response.PlannedEnhancement labels Nov 10, 2024
@wkxcass wkxcass added this to the v1.7 milestone Nov 10, 2024
@wkxcass wkxcass removed the response.Accepted A valid bug. label Nov 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
response.PlannedEnhancement severity.Low A flaw that is unlikely to affect normal operations of the product. type.FeatureFlaw Some functionality missing from a feature delivered in a way that the feature becomes less useful.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants