New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Questioning the requirements for having NumericalCheckStatement #57

Open

maximelefrancois86 opened this issue Sep 7, 2023 · 1 comment

Labels

discussion ontology

Contributor

maximelefrancois86 commented Sep 7, 2023

The modeling shall depend on what we actually need to tag in the regulation documents.

do we just need to tag subdivisions that express a physical quantity ? (where is the number, where is the unit)

is it just implicitly defining some category (those things which have property larger/smaller than )

and this category can be used as a second tag for a Requirement / Application / Selection / Exception subdivision ?

Contributor

VladimirAlexiev commented Dec 19, 2024

hi @maximelefrancois86 Is this still relevant? Is it a "bug" or you're happy to leave it as is?

VladimirAlexiev added ontology discussion labels

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment