You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 2, 2024. It is now read-only.
Telefonica testing tells us that there is 1/2 - 2/3 added overhead to query execution when running queries that trigger the UDFs.
Is there a way to improve the performance of the UDF functionality? Could the UDF functionality be inlined into the queries themselves instead, rather than requiring the invocation of actual UDFs defined on the level of the database?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is no way to do exception handling inline. We need UDFs for that.
The only workaround (in some cases) would be to enable bounds computations.
If they do that, they would also benefit from #4549.
Maybe we could add an option to only execute analysis queries at night so that they don't mind them as much?
Could we implement them in Java instead? I read somewhere (can't find the source) that PL/SQL is an order of magnitude slower than native implementations.
Telefonica testing tells us that there is 1/2 - 2/3 added overhead to query execution when running queries that trigger the UDFs.
Is there a way to improve the performance of the UDF functionality? Could the UDF functionality be inlined into the queries themselves instead, rather than requiring the invocation of actual UDFs defined on the level of the database?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: