We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A downstream issue made me notice that has-qed-box can appear on inline math mode.
A quick search through publications shows that this is fairly rare (20 cases over 9 journal articles right now).
In all but one case the tex-math element is empty (from $\qed$).
$\qed$
Is this desired behavior?
It's not hard to adjust downstream but my gut feeling is that inline elements should not have a qed box attribute.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
A downstream issue made me notice that has-qed-box can appear on inline math mode.
A quick search through publications shows that this is fairly rare (20 cases over 9 journal articles right now).
In all but one case the tex-math element is empty (from
$\qed$).Is this desired behavior?
It's not hard to adjust downstream but my gut feeling is that inline elements should not have a qed box attribute.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: