You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Evaluating the actual variables. This is the hard part because it requires a parser/interpreter. It is possible this will be easier with the implementation of a language server in Add language server #31, but I am not too familiar with all of that.
for (i = [0:10]) {
for (j = [0:i]) {
for (k = [i:j]) {
// Stuff
}
}
}
What about named parameters in function calls?
cylinder(h = height, r1 =10, r2 = r+10, center =true); // h = 10, r1 = 10, r2 = 20, center = true
How should long arrays or lots of parameters be handled?
Plans
As of right now, I have no immediate plans to implement this feature. However, I think it would be a cool feature to have in the extension. If anyone wants to take a go at this and submit a PR, please be my guest.
And an important question, does the nesting issue make this completely infeasible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is a dedicated thread to discuss the enhancement proposed by @Dorro101 in #32.
Proposal
It would be convenient to have a toggleable feature that displays the evaluated value of variables inline. For example,
There are two parts to this:
Other questions that still need to be answers:
for
loops be treated?let()
statements?Plans
As of right now, I have no immediate plans to implement this feature. However, I think it would be a cool feature to have in the extension. If anyone wants to take a go at this and submit a PR, please be my guest.
And an important question, does the nesting issue make this completely infeasible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: