You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been trying to test BBC dataset using only place feature (generated using pre/place/extract_feat.py) with place LGSS model you provide but got much worse results (AP around 40) than your paper (AP 79.5). I understand that the AP score mentioned in your paper was probably generated using all four features as well as global optimization. But I still expect using only place feature performs better than what I got. Do you know where I could be wrong?
Another question is BBC dataset provides 5 sets of ground truth labels, which one did you use in your evaluation?
Thanks a lot
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, great job on this work!
I have been trying to test BBC dataset using only place feature (generated using pre/place/extract_feat.py) with place LGSS model you provide but got much worse results (AP around 40) than your paper (AP 79.5). I understand that the AP score mentioned in your paper was probably generated using all four features as well as global optimization. But I still expect using only place feature performs better than what I got. Do you know where I could be wrong?
Another question is BBC dataset provides 5 sets of ground truth labels, which one did you use in your evaluation?
Thanks a lot
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: