Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[bug] Groq instrumentor missing input field #1039

Open
Jgilhuly opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[bug] Groq instrumentor missing input field #1039

Jgilhuly opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working instrumentation Adding instrumentations to open source packages language: python Related to Python integration

Comments

@Jgilhuly
Copy link

Describe the bug
Right now our groq instrumentor isn't properly capturing input values from groq chat completion calls. See the screenshot below

To Reproduce
Trace any call to groq's chat completion call. MRE: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1IaVpkMdkhfQkNRkds04HfqfLdv7DHkk2

Screenshots
Screenshot 2024-09-13 at 11 14 06 AM
Screenshot 2024-09-13 at 11 14 22 AM
Screenshot 2024-09-13 at 11 14 30 AM

@Jgilhuly Jgilhuly added bug Something isn't working triage Issues that require triage labels Sep 13, 2024
@Jgilhuly Jgilhuly changed the title [bug] Groq instrmentor missing input field [bug] Groq instrumentor missing input field Sep 13, 2024
@mikeldking
Copy link
Contributor

It's actually missing input messages entirely @harrisonchu and it looks like the messages are in the invocation params

@mikeldking mikeldking added instrumentation Adding instrumentations to open source packages language: python Related to Python integration and removed triage Issues that require triage labels Sep 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working instrumentation Adding instrumentations to open source packages language: python Related to Python integration
Projects
Status: 📘 Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants