Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why did I not train well according to your method? #24

Open
zsh1223 opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 10 comments
Open

Why did I not train well according to your method? #24

zsh1223 opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 10 comments

Comments

@zsh1223
Copy link

zsh1223 commented Nov 14, 2023

image
what is the difference between mono_fm and mono_fm-joint?

@Jamesgender
Copy link

Hello, can you tell me where are the training weights? I cant find them while training.

@zsh1223
Copy link
Author

zsh1223 commented Nov 17, 2023

你好,请问哪里有训练砝码?我在训练时找不到它们。

Hello, can you tell me where are the training weights? I cant find them while training.

You can find the pre trained weight here:
https://drive . Google . com/file/d/1 bimxnb 9 pegv 3 mzczb 3 UBW 3 EDI 4d pocxf/view

@Jamesgender
Copy link

Sorry, I mean the training weights not pretained weights. The common situation is that when you finished one epoch, the model evaluates on the val dataset and saves a weight. 1 2 3 and 20. But I cant find the weights saveing folder while training. Where the weights save?

@zsh1223
Copy link
Author

zsh1223 commented Nov 17, 2023

Sorry, I mean the training weights not pretained weights. The common situation is that when you finished one epoch, the model evaluates on the val dataset and saves a weight. 1 2 3 and 20. But I cant find the weights saveing folder while training. Where the weights save?

You can set the path where you want to save the training model in run. py. In author run.py,--work_dir results.That means,your finished one epoch is in the /GCNDepth/results.
I hope my answer is helpful to you

@Jamesgender
Copy link

Oh, I know my mistake. The first epoch is epoch1 rather than epoch0. So the model actually have not finished 1 epoch and saved weights. Thanks for your timely reply.

@Jamesgender
Copy link

I trained one epoch and got similar results to yours. Then the training was interrupted.
image
The first epoch's loss seems to be abnormal. When I trained MonoDepth2, the loss decreased rapidly. Have you ever met the same problem?

@lh-study
Copy link

lh-study commented Dec 1, 2023

Hello, may I ask how your mmcv=0.4.4 was installed? I have encountered the same problem as you, which is that the generated depth map is completely black, but I did not reproduce it. Instead, I used the author's decoder to modify and run it. So, how was your mmcv=0.4.4 installed?

image what is the difference between mono_fm and mono_fm-joint?

@ArminMasoumian
Copy link
Owner

Hello, may I ask how your mmcv=0.4.4 was installed? I have encountered the same problem as you, which is that the generated depth map is completely black, but I did not reproduce it. Instead, I used the author's decoder to modify and run it. So, how was your mmcv=0.4.4 installed?

image what is the difference between mono_fm and mono_fm-joint?

You can download the mmcv through this link:
https://pypi.org/project/mmcv/0.4.4/

@zsh1223
Copy link
Author

zsh1223 commented Dec 11, 2023

我训练了一个纪元,得到了与你相似的结果。然后训练被打断了。 图像第一个纪元的损失似乎是不正常的。当我训练 MonoDepth2 时,损失迅速下降。你有没有遇到过同样的问题?

May I ask if you have successfully reproduced this project. In the process of reproduction,the evaluation results of the model after training for 15 epochs are consistent with the epochs_1.

@Jamesgender
Copy link

我训练了一个纪元,得到了与你相似的结果。然后训练被打断了。 图像第一个纪元的损失似乎是不正常的。当我训练 MonoDepth2 时,损失迅速下降。你有没有遇到过同样的问题?

May I ask if you have successfully reproduced this project. In the process of reproduction,the evaluation results of the model after training for 15 epochs are consistent with the epochs_1.

My results are same as yours. The loss is abnormal and consistent with the first epoch 1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants