You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First, these glyph images are mapped correctly to their appropriate unicode. The issue here is the confusing glyph names, which stems form ambiguous Adobe Glyph List.
It is more appropriate to rename U+0162 and U+0163 as Tcedilla and tcedilla.
The true ?commaaccent glyphs U+0218, U+0218, U+021A, and U+021B, could use the recommended uni-names or the descriptive commaaccent names, as long as they are consistent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
First, these glyph images are mapped correctly to their appropriate unicode. The issue here is the confusing glyph names, which stems form ambiguous Adobe Glyph List.
It is more appropriate to rename U+0162 and U+0163 as Tcedilla and tcedilla.
The true ?commaaccent glyphs U+0218, U+0218, U+021A, and U+021B, could use the recommended uni-names or the descriptive commaaccent names, as long as they are consistent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: