Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confusing ?commaaccent glyph names #45

Open
apodtele opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Confusing ?commaaccent glyph names #45

apodtele opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@apodtele
Copy link

apodtele commented Feb 1, 2023

First, these glyph images are mapped correctly to their appropriate unicode. The issue here is the confusing glyph names, which stems form ambiguous Adobe Glyph List.

      U+015e => 266 Scedilla
      U+015f => 345 scedilla
      U+0162 => 371 Tcommaaccent
      U+0163 => 372 tcommaaccent
      U+0218 => 370 Scommaaccent
      U+0219 => 318 scommaaccent
      U+021a => 273 uni021A
      U+021b => 325 uni021B

It is more appropriate to rename U+0162 and U+0163 as Tcedilla and tcedilla.

The true ?commaaccent glyphs U+0218, U+0218, U+021A, and U+021B, could use the recommended uni-names or the descriptive commaaccent names, as long as they are consistent.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant