Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Raw data should be quantized #5

Closed
hugobuddel opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Raw data should be quantized #5

hugobuddel opened this issue Feb 29, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@hugobuddel
Copy link
Contributor

Currently the raw data is now float64, but it should be int16 when NDIT==1, and float32 when NDIT>1.

The Quantization Effect can be used for this.

See the data rates document.

The data rates document does not seem to take this doubling of the data size into account when NDIT>1; I'll take that up with Roy in the context of AstarVienna/METIS_DRLD#214 .

I think we should limit ourselves now to NDIT==1 and do NDIT>1 once we get there.

@astronomyk
Copy link

astronomyk commented Feb 29, 2024 via email

@hugobuddel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please add as a follow up to the disccussion worh roy that in the N-band a 1s DIT will probably already saturate the detector if we use 16-bit ints. How exactly we deal with that is not clear to me.

According to the data rates document, the minimum DIT in the LM mode is 40 ms, and the minimum in the N band is 11 ms (but then NDIT=4). So it should be feasible to not saturate the detector simply by not doing such long observations.

@hugobuddel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants