You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Besides needing more training data, the analyzer tool seems like an awesome test verification tool, the main concern that comes to mind is its usefulness for very large code bases.
When developing a new tool/algorithm/application it could be useful to run this tool periodically since it would help build a solid test suite, however when tackling an already existing codebase (a very large one) it seems like the tool would take too long to scan through the code and add mutations.
Is there a plan for an implementation that covers large codebases?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
carmop
changed the title
Issue from 610 student for class activity
Are there plans to improve performance to tackle large codebases with this tool?(Issue from 610 student for class activity)
Mar 1, 2024
Besides needing more training data, the analyzer tool seems like an awesome test verification tool, the main concern that comes to mind is its usefulness for very large code bases.
When developing a new tool/algorithm/application it could be useful to run this tool periodically since it would help build a solid test suite, however when tackling an already existing codebase (a very large one) it seems like the tool would take too long to scan through the code and add mutations.
Is there a plan for an implementation that covers large codebases?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: