You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 8, 2023. It is now read-only.
First of all thanks for a great plugin which has the potential to make things much easier.
So far I have been using a pipeline like gphoto2 --stdout --capture-movie | gst-launch-1.0 fdsrc ! decodebin3 name=dec ! queue ! videoconvert ! v4l2sink device=/dev/video11
and the v4l source in obs. In sum this uses up rougly 40% to 50% CPU time on my system (including obs), about half of that for gphoto2.
The plugin is much more convenient (and potentially gives more controls), of course, and I expected it to be more efficient because it bypasses v4l. Alas obs uses up rougly 50% with it. This is not much more but still surprising. Is ImageMagick the bottle-neck here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Meanwhile I've discovered dunkelstern's fork which replaces ImageMagick by jpeg-turbo and brings down CPU usage to a little over 40%, bringing the plugin in on par with the pipeline solution. I guess this is a testament to the efficiency of v4l.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
First of all thanks for a great plugin which has the potential to make things much easier.
So far I have been using a pipeline like
gphoto2 --stdout --capture-movie | gst-launch-1.0 fdsrc ! decodebin3 name=dec ! queue ! videoconvert ! v4l2sink device=/dev/video11
and the v4l source in obs. In sum this uses up rougly 40% to 50% CPU time on my system (including obs), about half of that for gphoto2.
The plugin is much more convenient (and potentially gives more controls), of course, and I expected it to be more efficient because it bypasses v4l. Alas obs uses up rougly 50% with it. This is not much more but still surprising. Is ImageMagick the bottle-neck here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: