You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If a service is already running before Axon Server is started, the context is not propagated to the service until that service is restarted.
In other words, when a user of this extension connects during the "reconnect" phase and then a new context is created, the service is required to be restarted.
Steps to reproduce and problem
The following message from a user of the extension makes the predicament clear:
Hi,
We encounter a strange behaviour with the services and contexts: It looks like, that if a service is already running before the axon server is started, so the connection happens during "reconnect", and then a new context is created, the context is not propagated to the service, until that service is restarted again.
Is this Problem already known? is there a configuration option etc, that solves this?
(We are using the tenants for multi tenancy => new contexts will dynamically be created, and therefore it is important, that all services notice this new context.
For the context registration/detection we are using:
public TenantConnectPredicate tenantFilterPredicate() {
return context -> context.tenantId().startsWith("organization-");
}
Expected behaviour
The Multitenancy Extension should be resilient and reconnect if context updates break the channel's connection.
Actual behaviour
The Multitenancy extension may lose the connection from the context updates channel.
Since it is unable to reconnect, future updates never occur.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If a service is already running before Axon Server is started, the context is not propagated to the service until that service is restarted.
In other words, when a user of this extension connects during the "reconnect" phase and then a new context is created, the service is required to be restarted.
Steps to reproduce and problem
The following message from a user of the extension makes the predicament clear:
Expected behaviour
The Multitenancy Extension should be resilient and reconnect if context updates break the channel's connection.
Actual behaviour
The Multitenancy extension may lose the connection from the context updates channel.
Since it is unable to reconnect, future updates never occur.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: