Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question/feature request: Why is the VM initiative only deployed to Landing Zones? #399

Closed
1 task done
MarcoJanse opened this issue Oct 31, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #435
Closed
1 task done
Assignees
Labels
Area: Policy 📝 Issues / PR's related to Policy Pattern: ALZ 🚁 Issues / PR's related to the ALZ Pattern question Further information is requested

Comments

@MarcoJanse
Copy link

Check for previous/existing GitHub issues

  • I have checked for previous/existing GitHub issues

Description

Why is the VM initiative only deployed to Landing Zones? I can understand that most Virtual machines will reside in Landing Zones, but how about Domain Controllers running on virtual machines that reside in the Identity management group or other VMs running in ?

I have multiple Azure customers that use virtual machines outside the Landing Zones management group, like:

  • Domain Controller virtual machines in the Identity or Platform management group.
  • A network virtual appliance (NVA) in the Connectivity or Platform management group.
  • A jump host/management server in the Management or Platform management group.

It would be great if this could also be deployed to additional management groups by a boolean parameter or something alike. You could even give customers the option to monitor VMs in the Sandbox if they want to.

@MarcoJanse MarcoJanse added the question Further information is requested label Oct 31, 2024
@arjenhuitema
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @MarcoJanse

Thanks for your feedback. Good point.

The Landing Zone initiative was recently divided into multiple initiatives to support a more modular approach. One of the reasons for this change is to facilitate precisely what you are proposing.

We are making progress towards assigning the VM initiative to the Identity and Connectivity management groups. This work item is in our backlog and is scheduled for completion in November.

Thanks,

Arjen

@arjenhuitema arjenhuitema added Area: Policy 📝 Issues / PR's related to Policy Pattern: ALZ 🚁 Issues / PR's related to the ALZ Pattern labels Nov 1, 2024
@Brunoga-MS Brunoga-MS linked a pull request Nov 27, 2024 that will close this issue
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Policy 📝 Issues / PR's related to Policy Pattern: ALZ 🚁 Issues / PR's related to the ALZ Pattern question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants