Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mismatch of feature ordering (matrices vs. dendograms) #154

Open
rkdy opened this issue Nov 11, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Mismatch of feature ordering (matrices vs. dendograms) #154

rkdy opened this issue Nov 11, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
API New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@rkdy
Copy link
Collaborator

rkdy commented Nov 11, 2020

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
For the feature affinity matrices (redundancy matrix, synergy matrix, association matrix), it's super helpful to have features already in an order to highlight clusters visually. However, in the dendograms the order differs (due to an additional sorting step with respect to feature importance).

Describe the solution you'd like
Apply the dendogram order to the matrices, so you can "rediscover" the already identified clusters when switching visualizations.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Could also adjust the dendogram ordering to match the current matrix ordering, but I think it's helpful to guide the ordering by feature importance, also for the matrices.

@rkdy rkdy added the API New feature or request label Nov 11, 2020
@j-ittner j-ittner added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Sep 24, 2021
@j-ittner
Copy link
Member

Will be implemented in the upcoming release of FACET 2

@j-ittner j-ittner modified the milestones: 2.0.0, 2.0.1 Jul 4, 2023
@j-ittner j-ittner modified the milestones: 2.0.1, 2.2.0 Jul 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants