We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi!
The OBO semantics describes the following procedure to use local names for RO (and BFO) relationships:
So for instance the following frame from rnao.obo:
rnao.obo
[Typedef] id: ro.owl#has_quality name: has quality
should instead be declared
[Typedef] id: has_quality xref: RO:has_quality
See the OBO semantics section 5.9.3 and 8.2.2 for more information about this mechanism.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi!
The OBO semantics describes the following procedure to use local names for RO (and BFO) relationships:
So for instance the following frame from
rnao.obo
:should instead be declared
[Typedef] id: has_quality xref: RO:has_quality
See the OBO semantics section 5.9.3 and 8.2.2 for more information about this mechanism.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: