Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[bug] Txs in mempool are sometimes not mined into upcoming block #108

Open
ch4ot1c opened this issue Feb 12, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

[bug] Txs in mempool are sometimes not mined into upcoming block #108

ch4ot1c opened this issue Feb 12, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@ch4ot1c
Copy link
Contributor

ch4ot1c commented Feb 12, 2019

Using both sendtoaddress and create / sign / sendrawtransaction, transparent transactions are successfully created accepted into the mempool by the daemon. However, they often remain in the pool after blocks are mined, without being marked invalid or otherwise used or removed.

This happens exclusively on the testnet.

The BTCP team has spent some time investigating this 'sometimes' behavior, with focus on testing for regressions. None are apparent, so it appears there is a logic issue within.

We should run testblockvalidity with the contents of the mempool while it is full of candidate txs. CreateBlockTemplate also neesd to be investigated, to find the reason that some txs (txs are sometimes?) being accepted into upcoming blocks.

Don't forget to run the daemon with -debug for additional logging output.


Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant