-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
broken "-ua" option #60
Comments
this is my python error:
|
I tried and can replicate the output. The problem is with the chemiscope output. When I do there's no problem and it outputs per-atom descriptors. Back then I recall chemiscope cannot handle both global & atomic descriptors at the same time. Maybe now things have changed. But the I/O to get chemiscope files in ASAP do not seem to handle both. |
Thanks for looking into this. In this case I only want per atom output. would the chemiscope output work if I turned off the global output (and if so how do I do that?) |
It has been a while since I looked into the updates of chemiscope, but back
then I recall that it can only handle the per-atom output for a single
frame. Maybe things have changed now.
Chemiscope now have a python interface and can be loaded in a Jupyter
notebook, maybe for. this case it's easier that way than loading from the
html.
Otherwise I recall the projection_view can handle the per-atom and global
output without problem. It takes the xyz file.
…On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 12:58 PM gabor1 ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for looking into this. In this case I only want per atom output.
would the chemiscope output work if I turned off the global output (and if
so how do I do that?)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#60 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABX4HLCATAKEFTRQC7O4ZMLWB2WEXANCNFSM6AAAAAAQ53VE2A>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
In this case I only want per atom output. would the chemiscope output work if I turned off the global output (and if so how do I do that?)
— Gábor
Gabor Csanyi
Professor of Molecular Modelling
Engineering Laboratory
University of Cambridge
…------- Original Message -------
On Thursday, October 6th, 2022 at 06:52, Bingqing Cheng ***@***.***> wrote:
I tried and can replicate the output.
The problem is with the chemiscope output. When I do
asap map -f ASAP-desc.xyz -o xyz -dm '[*]' -ua pca -d 2
there's no problem and it outputs per-atom descriptors.
Back then I recall chemiscope cannot handle both global & atomic descriptors at the same time. Maybe now things have changed. But the I/O to get chemiscope files in ASAP do not seem to handle both.
—
Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](#60 (comment)), or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIANZ3KKQM77LCFTMAZJILWB2VQXANCNFSM6AAAAAAQ53VE2A).
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hi!
I'm trying to compute soap vectors for environments and then PCA the atomic soap vectors. the PCA map appears, but the output file doesn't get written, I get a python error. Am I doing something wrong?
if I remove the "-ua" option, so work with global descriptors, it's fine. I enclose my input xyz file.
tmp.xyz.gz
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: