You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When trying to simulate the impact of Broadwell CPU architecture using the GUI (https://datavizta.boavizta.org/serversimpact), the more cores are added, the lower the manufacturing carbon footprint of the CPU goes.
E.g. for 1 CPU with 0 core, the result is 24.3 kgCO2e, with 1 CPU with 1 core, it is 23.8, for 1 CPU with 10 cores, it is 19.9, etc.
The carbon footprint of 1 core seems to be -0.4393 kgCO2e, probably instead of 0.4393, when comparing to Skylake or Cascade Lake carbon footprint (respectively 0.4689 and 0.4356)
Not tested with the API
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When trying to simulate the impact of Broadwell CPU architecture using the GUI (https://datavizta.boavizta.org/serversimpact), the more cores are added, the lower the manufacturing carbon footprint of the CPU goes.
E.g. for 1 CPU with 0 core, the result is 24.3 kgCO2e, with 1 CPU with 1 core, it is 23.8, for 1 CPU with 10 cores, it is 19.9, etc.
The carbon footprint of 1 core seems to be -0.4393 kgCO2e, probably instead of 0.4393, when comparing to Skylake or Cascade Lake carbon footprint (respectively 0.4689 and 0.4356)
Not tested with the API
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: