Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/622 read bodc #646

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Feature/622 read bodc #646

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jpolton
Copy link
Collaborator

@jpolton jpolton commented Nov 6, 2023

Pull request checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug fixes / features)
  • Build (./build.sh) was run locally and no errors reported. NB not sure about this requirement: GitActions test this
  • Lint (pylint .) has passed locally and any fixes were made for failures. NB not sure about this requirement: GitActions test this with black

Pull request type

Please check the type of change your PR introduces:

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other (please describe):

What is the current behavior?

Issue URL: #

What is the new behavior?

Checklist

  • Code compiles correctly
  • Created tests which fail without the change (if possible)
  • All tests passing (pip install . && pytest unit_testing/unit_test.py -s)
  • Extended the README / documentation, if necessary
  • Added myself / the copyright holder to the AUTHORS file

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

@jpolton jpolton linked an issue Nov 6, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

tidegauge.read_bodc() update
1 participant