Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvement: Reassigned method mathematics #2

Open
Tremeschin opened this issue Sep 29, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Improvement: Reassigned method mathematics #2

Tremeschin opened this issue Sep 29, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Tremeschin
Copy link
Member

I somewhat understand the math for this better spectrogram visualizations method, and have got it working at least once. However, I couldn't make it "fast"

(Note for future self, technical reasons)

  • The interpolation of "target" bins for the shifted frequencies array of the FFT is expensive even for nearest(), is band pass the right way to go?
  • How to reassign in time, what does that even mean? With frequency it's understandable, but I didn't see a relationship with temporal stability and "promises"; in that case should we write to a future pixel of the texture for all points?

Writing that just gave me an very interesting idea: what if we simply integrate all points we have in the FFT in the final texture target!?!?

No need to interpolate at all! I'll HAVE* to investigate this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Eventually
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant