You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 10, 2022. It is now read-only.
I should actually change this. I think the best way is to measure the original form normals at all the derived contour points and try to make the cut normal as perpendicular to this as possible. This is a valid assumption on a limited set of cases but will make a predictable and easy to implement result. Caveat, mesh normals must be updated and calculated and not tampered with previously
Iteratively "wiggle" (in orientation) a cross section to mimimize it's area. This usually represents the most ideal cross section.
sub to do....function to calculate area of a loop. Does this already exit? For simple shapes this is very easy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: