EDA Checkpoint Feedback

[ShanEllis]

EDA Checkpoint Feedback

Score (out of 5 pts)

Score = 4

EDA Checkpoint Feedback

	Quality	Reasons
EDA Relevance	D	Does not explore race at all. Also note that just comparing number of deaths across coasts is not relevant. These should be rates, scaled by population to make the comparison meaningful. Are there more deaths b/c there are more people? Or are there more deaths b/c the rate was higher?
EDA Analysis and Description	D	In section 1 if you want to focus on east/west, only display those rows. And, any time you display a table or visualization you'll need to describe what the viewer is to learn from that and relate it back to your question.
EDA Figures	D	Table have too many significant digits. Explanations fail to make clear what's being displayed AND what we're to learn from it. you have to guide the viewer as to the takeaway message. Nothing exploring race here.

Comments

Regrade Feedback

Returning all points for Data Checkpoint, but for final report this section will need additional text guiding the reader, beyond the code comments, just helping to guide the viewer as to what's going on in the code cells to follow.

Rubric

	Unsatisfactory	Developing	Proficient	Excellent
EDA relevance	EDA is mostly neither relevant to the question nor helpful in figuring out how to address the question. Or the EDA does address the question, but many obviously relevant variables / analyses / figures were not included. EDA does not include explore distributions of single variables or relationships between variables or both	EDA is partly irrelevant/unhelpful. Or some obviously relevant variables / analyses / figures were not included. EDA does not include a few distributions of single variables or relationships between variables	EDA is almost all relevant / helpful in addressing the question. No obviously relevant variables / analyses / figures were not included.	Thorough EDA addressed all aspects that are relevant to the question
EDA analysis and description	Many of the analyses are poor choices (e.g., using means instead of medians for obviously skewed data), or are poorly described in the text, or do not aid understanding the data	Some of the analyses are poor choices, or are poorly described in the text, or do not aid understanding the data	All analyses are correct choices. Only one or two have minor issues in the text descriptions supporting them. Mostly they fit well with other elements of the EDA and support understanding the data	All analyses are correct choices with clear text descriptions supporting them. The figures fit well with the other elements of the EDA, producing a clear understanding of the data.
EDA figures	Many of the figures are poor plot choices (e.g., using a bar plot to represent a time series where it would be better to use a line plot) or have poor aesthetics (including colormap, data point shape/color, axis labels, titles, annotations, text legibility) or do not aid understanding the data	Some of the figures are poor plot choices or have poor aesthetics. Some figures do not aid understanding the data	All figures are correct plot choices. Only one or two have minor questionable aesthetic choices. The figures mostly fit well with the other elements of the EDA and support understanding the data	All figures are correct plot choices with beautiful aesthetics. The figures fit well with the other elements of the EDA, producing a clear understanding of the data.

Grading Rules

Scoring: Out of 5 points

Each Developing => -1 pts
Each Unsatisfactory=> -2 pts
until the score is 0

If students address the detailed feedback in a future checkpoint they will earn these points back

DETAILED FEEDBACK should be left in the data section AND anywhere the student addressed proposal feedback but did not do it to your satisfaction

[KaylaMaldonado]

We made changes to our project based on this feedback.