Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pfsd picks a lot of UPnP ports #281

Open
VoyTechnology opened this issue Feb 10, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

pfsd picks a lot of UPnP ports #281

VoyTechnology opened this issue Feb 10, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@VoyTechnology
Copy link
Member

Output of meta/logs/pfsd.log:

2016/02/10 19:46:13 [INFO]  main: UPnP devices available
2016/02/10 19:46:13 [INFO]  upnp: Picked port: 40949
2016/02/10 19:46:13 [INFO]  upnp: Picked port: 58583
2016/02/10 19:46:13 [INFO]  upnp: Picked port: 41288
2016/02/10 19:46:13 [INFO]  upnp: Picked port: 36086
2016/02/10 19:46:13 [INFO]  upnp: Picked port: 518
2016/02/10 19:46:13 [INFO]  upnp: Picked port: 14587
2016/02/10 19:46:13 [INFO]  upnp: Picked port: 1547
2016/02/10 19:46:13 [INFO]  upnp: Picked port: 24300
2016/02/10 19:46:13 [INFO]  upnp: Picked port: 54828
2016/02/10 19:46:13 [INFO]  upnp: Picked port: 21832
2016/02/10 19:46:13 [INFO]  main: Peer address: 192.168.192.26:34529
2016/02/10 19:46:14 [INFO]  dnetclient: Currently Connected: 192.168.192.26:38659,
2016/02/10 19:46:14 [INFO]  dnetclient: Successfully joined discovery network
2016/02/10 19:46:14 [INFO]  main: Starting ParanoidNetwork server with TLS.

Steps to reproduce this issue:
paranoid-cli mount test test

@GoldenBadger
Copy link
Contributor

This may in fact not be my fault, so I'll unassign it until we figure out what's causing it.

@VoyTechnology
Copy link
Member Author

Is this closed since #283 is merged?

@ConorGriffin37
Copy link

No that just added additional logging. I am unable to replicate this issue so I can't look into it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants