Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
We certainly did not hit the June cutoff, but the step assembly import PR (#1779) is close to being merged. I believe that material support (#1815) is going to be left for a future release. Do we still want to try to get #1853 done, or should that be left to the next release as well? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
-
It looks like #1853 is ready to merge. If there are no objections, I will work on releasing CadQuery 2.6 after that is merged. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I would like to do a June release of CadQuery, which will be 2.6. There are some PRs that we should probably try to merge before that release. Below is a list of the PRs that I'm aware of that are close enough to merging to make the June release window.
This may need to wait for new releases of upstream packages, I'm not sure.We will try to merge this one.Future Release
Thoughts?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions