Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Letfuns shouldn't have to live in the same module #13

Open
IlmariReissumies opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Letfuns shouldn't have to live in the same module #13

IlmariReissumies opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement good first issue

Comments

@IlmariReissumies
Copy link
Member

Currently payloadLang$config contains a field letModule, and the assumption made for payload_to_cakeml is that all functions used in Let bindings live in a module with name letModule.

This seems overly restrictive: for example, it would be convenient to be able to supply some functions as part of a standard library.

This issue is to adapt the payload_cakeml phase and the associated proofs to allow the letfuns to live in different modules.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement good first issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@IlmariReissumies