-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DiffEqSensitivity -> SciMLSensitivity #110
Comments
Only getting around to this now 😱 and running into some issues. The error is |
Ping @DhairyaLGandhi over here, also linking to #111 |
Pinging again, @DhairyaLGandhi and/or @ChrisRackauckas, any insight on the above? |
Maybe there's an X-Y problem here. What's the reason for even having these libraries? IIRC, it was for a DEQ, but nowadays should you just use the AGNs with https://docs.sciml.ai/DeepEquilibriumNetworks/stable/ ? If you stick an AGN inside of that it should be fine? The simplest thing to do may be to just slim down. |
Hopefully I'll actually get around to trying this soon...does this mean that I should convert AGN over to using Lux instead of Flux? Or will DeepEquilibriumNetworks play nice with my Flux-based layers? |
@avikpal does it? |
See SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl#665 . It looks like the interfaces you use are unchanged so it should be a very simple update.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: