Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

validation sequences vs testing sequences #54

Open
RandyChen233 opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

validation sequences vs testing sequences #54

RandyChen233 opened this issue May 8, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@RandyChen233
Copy link

How are the validation and testing sequences chosen in params.py? They do not align with the original paper at all. Moreover, the original paper does not mention how the validation dataset is chosen, what is indeed mentioned is the following:
"In order to have a
separate dataset for testing, only the Sequence 00, 02, 08
and 09 which are relatively long are used for training. The
trajectories are segmented to different lengths to generate
much data for training, producing 7410 samples in total. The
trained models are tested on the Sequence 03, 04, 05, 06, 07
and 10 for evaluation."

Can someone clarify? In params.py the training set was chosen as [00, 01 ,02 ,05 ,08, 09], and the testing data set was ['04', '05', '07', '10', '09'], why??

@mc1017
Copy link

mc1017 commented Jan 3, 2024

It also confuses me as testing dataset should not be used in training and validation dataset.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants