We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
universal_func_type
There are two functions called universal_func_type. One is defined in UniversalFunctions:
UniversalFunctions
SurfaceFluxes.jl/src/UniversalFunctions.jl
Line 1113 in f83dc86
and the other is defined in Parameters:
Parameters
SurfaceFluxes.jl/src/Parameters.jl
Line 25 in f83dc86
The prefix UF in the second is what allows this duplication.
UF
The Parameters version is called here:
SurfaceFluxes.jl/src/SurfaceFluxes.jl
Line 293 in f83dc86
This is annoying if one needs to extend universal_func_type in an external package, so I propose we eliminate the dichotomy and use just one function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
There are two functions called
universal_func_type
. One is defined inUniversalFunctions
:SurfaceFluxes.jl/src/UniversalFunctions.jl
Line 1113 in f83dc86
and the other is defined in
Parameters
:SurfaceFluxes.jl/src/Parameters.jl
Line 25 in f83dc86
The prefix
UF
in the second is what allows this duplication.The
Parameters
version is called here:SurfaceFluxes.jl/src/SurfaceFluxes.jl
Line 293 in f83dc86
This is annoying if one needs to extend
universal_func_type
in an external package, so I propose we eliminate the dichotomy and use just one function.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: