Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

We think it's best to detect climate misinformation by analysing author of post/tweet #10

Open
ricjhill opened this issue Oct 11, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
assumption validation Research the assumption and collect evidence to determine if it is valid or not.

Comments

@ricjhill
Copy link
Contributor

We need to decide what to detect to determine whether Climate Misinformation is present, Climate information is present, or neither is present, depending on the above assumption and what decision was made.

How you should validate the assumption:

  • do some research to understand what current solutions do.
  • outline the pros/cons/limitations of this specific approach.
  • describe the technical complexities if any.
  • What's the expected level of accuracy?
  • if we wanted a basic POC - how long would it take?
  • Once your done - please complete ''Effort'' and ''Fit for purpose''.
@ricjhill ricjhill added the assumption validation Research the assumption and collect evidence to determine if it is valid or not. label Oct 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assumption validation Research the assumption and collect evidence to determine if it is valid or not.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant