Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use cases without syntax errors that fail tests should not be abandoned #103

Open
iejzh opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@iejzh
Copy link

iejzh commented Jun 20, 2024

When a use case run fails, is it a problem with the code under test or the test case? Something to consider.

@EmbeddedDevops1
Copy link
Collaborator

Excellent question. We don't differentiate right now because the whole purpose of Cover Agent (as of now) is to provide working tests for regressions.

We'd love your feedback on how to improve Cover Agent and find ways to tell the user that their "code is broken." Any suggestions?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants