Information content entities, qualities of bearers, and measurement units, information structure #596
Labels
Pending
This label designates issues that require further responses or action to assess.
Definition of information content entity:
The comment about measurement scale not being a concern of ICEs seems to conflict with the fact that measurement unit is a subclass of ICE.
Language is defined as
So a format, subclass of ICE, explicitly excluded by the emphasized text.
I have a couple of thoughts about this but would appreciate comments or clarification.
The whole comment should just be deleted. Depending on how one defines allowable concretizations of an ICE these might or might not be aspects of the ICE. We don't currently have a relation between ICEs that share concretizations, but might have one e.g. One ICE might allow the content to be expressed in any language, and a second only in English. The relation is that the concretizations of the latter are subset of the concretizations of the former.
Measurement unit, language, format belong under (the as yet undefined) information structure. For instance the two classes in the first content might differ in that the former is structured with a language but not any particular language, but the latter structured only by English.
I lean towards implementing (2), adding the relation mentioned in (1), then changing the comment to reflect that those characteristics are of structure, not qualities.
A tentative definition of information structure:
Examples: Matrix structure, rasterized structure, video structure, list structure, textural structure, SVG format, spreadsheet structure, the English language, glyph
This paper mentions information structure entity, however, the idea isn't developed very far.
More to say about this, but let's hear first impressions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: