Describe events in cw-tutorial (#200)

src/pages/tutorial/cw-contract/_meta.json

@@ -6,5 +6,6 @@
   "testing-query": "Testing the query",
   "multitest-introduction": "Multitest introduction",
   "state": "Storing state",
-  "execution": "Execution messages"
+  "execution": "Execution messages",
+  "event": "Passing events"
 }

src/pages/tutorial/cw-contract/event.mdx

@@ -0,0 +1,275 @@
+import { Tabs } from "nextra/components";
+
+# Events attributes and data
+
+The only way our contract can communicate with the world, for now, is through queries. Smart
+contracts are passive - they cannot invoke any action by themselves. They can do it only as a
+reaction to a call. But if you've ever tried playing with
+[`wasmd`](https://github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd), you know that execution on the blockchain can return
+some metadata.
+
+There are two things the contract can return to the caller: events and data. Events are something
+produced by almost every real-life smart contract. In contrast, data is rarely used, designed for
+contract-to-contract communication.
+
+## Returning events
+
+As an example, we would add an event `admin_added` emitted by our contract on the execution of
+`AddMembers`:
+
+<Tabs items={['Storey', 'StoragePlus']}>
+  <Tabs.Tab>
+
+```rust {4, 29-35, 45} copy filename="src/contract.rs"
+use crate::error::ContractError;
+use crate::msg::{ExecuteMsg, GreetResp, InstantiateMsg, QueryMsg};
+use crate::state::ADMINS;
+use cosmwasm_std::{to_json_binary, Binary, Deps, DepsMut, Env, MessageInfo, Response, StdResult};
+use cw_storey::CwStorage;
+
+// ...
+
+mod exec {
+    use cosmwasm_std::Event;
+
+    use super::*;
+
+    pub fn add_members(
+        deps: DepsMut,
+        info: MessageInfo,
+        admins: Vec<String>,
+    ) -> Result<Response, ContractError> {
+        let mut cw_storage = CwStorage(deps.storage);
+
+        // Consider proper error handling instead of `unwrap`.
+        let mut curr_admins = ADMINS.access(&cw_storage).get()?.unwrap();
+        if !curr_admins.contains(&info.sender) {
+            return Err(ContractError::Unauthorized {
+                sender: info.sender,
+            });
+        }
+
+        let events = admins
+            .iter()
+            .map(|admin| Event::new("admin_added").add_attribute("addr", admin));
+        let resp = Response::new()
+            .add_events(events)
+            .add_attribute("action", "add_members")
+            .add_attribute("added_count", admins.len().to_string());
+
+        let admins: StdResult<Vec<_>> = admins
+            .into_iter()
+            .map(|addr| deps.api.addr_validate(&addr))
+            .collect();
+
+        curr_admins.append(&mut admins?);
+        ADMINS.access(&mut cw_storage).set(&curr_admins)?;
+
+        Ok(resp)
+    }
+
+    // ...
+}
+
+// ...
+```
+
+  </Tabs.Tab>
+  <Tabs.Tab>
+
+```rust {4, 37-43, 53} filename="src/contract.rs"
+use crate::error::ContractError;
+use crate::msg::{AdminsListResp, ExecuteMsg, GreetResp, InstantiateMsg, QueryMsg};
+use crate::state::ADMINS;
+use cosmwasm_std::{to_binary, Binary, Deps, DepsMut, Env, MessageInfo, Response, StdResult};
+
+// ...
+
+pub fn execute(
+    deps: DepsMut,
+    _env: Env,
+    info: MessageInfo,
+    msg: ExecuteMsg,
+) -> Result<Response, ContractError> {
+    use ExecuteMsg::*;
+
+    match msg {
+        AddMembers { admins } => exec::add_members(deps, info, admins),
+        Leave {} => exec::leave(deps, info),
+    }
+}
+
+mod exec {
+    use super::*;
+
+    pub fn add_members(
+        deps: DepsMut,
+        info: MessageInfo,
+        admins: Vec<String>,
+    ) -> Result<Response, ContractError> {
+        let mut curr_admins = ADMINS.load(deps.storage)?;
+        if !curr_admins.contains(&info.sender) {
+            return Err(ContractError::Unauthorized {
+                sender: info.sender,
+            });
+        }
+
+        let events = admins
+            .iter()
+            .map(|admin| Event::new("admin_added").add_attribute("addr", admin));
+        let resp = Response::new()
+            .add_events(events)
+            .add_attribute("action", "add_members")
+            .add_attribute("added_count", admins.len().to_string());
+
+        let admins: StdResult<Vec<_>> = admins
+            .into_iter()
+            .map(|addr| deps.api.addr_validate(&addr))
+            .collect();
+
+        curr_admins.append(&mut admins?);
+        ADMINS.save(deps.storage, &curr_admins)?;
+
+        Ok(resp)
+    }
+
+    pub fn leave(deps: DepsMut, info: MessageInfo) -> Result<Response, ContractError> {
+        ADMINS.update(deps.storage, move |admins| -> StdResult<_> {
+            let admins = admins
+                .into_iter()
+                .filter(|admin| *admin != info.sender)
+                .collect();
+            Ok(admins)
+        })?;
+
+        Ok(Response::new())
+    }
+}
+
+// ...
+```
+
+  </Tabs.Tab>
+</Tabs>
+
+An event is built from two things: an event type provided in the
+[`new`](https://docs.rs/cosmwasm-std/latest/cosmwasm_std/struct.Event.html#method.new) function and
+attributes. Attributes are added to an event with the
+[`add_attributes`](https://docs.rs/cosmwasm-std/latest/cosmwasm_std/struct.Event.html#method.add_attributes)
+or the
+[`add_attribute`](https://docs.rs/cosmwasm-std/latest/cosmwasm_std/struct.Event.html#method.add_attribute)
+call. Attributes are key-value pairs. Because an event cannot contain any list, to achieve reporting
+multiple similar actions taking place, we need to emit multiple small events instead of a collective
+one.
+
+Events are emitted by adding them to the response with
+[`add_event`](https://docs.rs/cosmwasm-std/latest/cosmwasm_std/struct.Response.html#method.add_event)
+or
+[`add_events`](https://docs.rs/cosmwasm-std/latest/cosmwasm_std/struct.Response.html#method.add_events)
+call. Additionally, there is a possibility to add attributes directly to the response. It is just
+sugar. By default, every execution emits a standard "wasm" event. Adding attributes to the result
+adds them to the default event.
+
+We can check if events are properly emitted by contract. It is not always done, as it is much of
+boilerplate in test, but events are, generally, more like logs - not necessarily considered main
+contract logic. Let's now write single test checking if execution emits events:
+
+```rust {43-76} filename="src/contract.rs"
+#[cfg(test)]
+mod tests {
+    use cw_multi_test::{App, ContractWrapper, Executor, IntoAddr};
+
+    use crate::msg::AdminsListResp;
+
+    use super::*;
+
+    // ...
+
+    #[test]
+    fn add_members() {
+        let mut app = App::default();
+
+        let code = ContractWrapper::new(execute, instantiate, query);
+        let code_id = app.store_code(Box::new(code));
+        let owner = "owner".into_addr();
+
+        let addr = app
+            .instantiate_contract(
+                code_id,
+                owner.clone(),
+                &InstantiateMsg {
+                    admins: vec![owner.to_string()],
+                },
+                &[],
+                "Contract",
+                None,
+            )
+            .unwrap();
+
+        let resp = app
+            .execute_contract(
+                owner.clone(),
+                addr,
+                &ExecuteMsg::AddMembers {
+                    admins: vec![owner.to_string()],
+                },
+                &[],
+            )
+            .unwrap();
+
+        let wasm = resp.events.iter().find(|ev| ev.ty == "wasm").unwrap();
+        assert_eq!(
+            wasm.attributes
+                .iter()
+                .find(|attr| attr.key == "action")
+                .unwrap()
+                .value,
+            "add_members"
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            wasm.attributes
+                .iter()
+                .find(|attr| attr.key == "added_count")
+                .unwrap()
+                .value,
+            "1"
+        );
+
+        let admin_added: Vec<_> = resp
+            .events
+            .iter()
+            .filter(|ev| ev.ty == "wasm-admin_added")
+            .collect();
+        assert_eq!(admin_added.len(), 1);
+
+        assert_eq!(
+            admin_added[0]
+                .attributes
+                .iter()
+                .find(|attr| attr.key == "addr")
+                .unwrap()
+                .value,
+            owner.to_string()
+        );
+    }
+}
+```
+
+As you can see, testing events on a simple test made it clunky. First of all, every event is heavily
+string-based - a lack of type control makes writing such tests difficult. Also, event types are
+prefixed with "wasm-" - it may not be a huge problem, but it doesn't clarify verification. But the
+problem is how layered the structure of events is, which makes verifying them tricky. Also, the
+"wasm" event is particularly tricky, as it contains an implied attribute - `_contract_addr`
+containing the address that called the contract. My general rule is - do not test emitted events
+unless some logic depends on them.
+
+## Data
+
+Besides events, any smart contract execution may produce a `data` object. In contrast to events,
+`data` can be structured. It makes it a way better choice to perform any communication the logic
+relies on. On the other hand, it turns out it is very rarely helpful outside of contract-to-contract
+communication. Data is always a singular object within the response, and it's set with the
+[`set_data`](https://docs.rs/cosmwasm-std/latest/cosmwasm_std/struct.Response.html#method.set_data)
+function. Because of its low usefulness in a single contract environment, we will not spend time on
+it right now - an example of it will be covered later when contract-to-contract communication will
+be discussed. Until then, it is just helpful to know such an entity exists.