You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
... I would expect to see all publications from ISSN 1942-7786 published since 1 June 2019.
However, the list includes publication dates before 2019 (like from 2009, from 2010 etc.), and it actually omits publications that should be listed, such as this one: https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177/1942778620918041 (published 2020).
Is there anything wrong with my query? When I replace from-pub-date with from-published-date, the results do not change.
By the way, I notice similar issues with other ISSNs as well, so the confusing results do not seem to be grounded in the journal.
Thank you for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In this case, a filter should be used: ?filter=from-pub-date:2019-06-01&.... This will have the effect of filtering based on the value of a specific field.
In your current version, a query performs a full text search using given terms, in this case "from", "pub", "date", "2019", "06, "01". It does not interpret the value in any way. This is probably not what you want.
Hello, thanks for the great service with the CrossRef API!
When I use a query like this ...
https://api.crossref.org/journals/1942-7786/works?query=from-pub-date:2019-06-01&select=is-referenced-by-count,DOI,title,published&rows=1000&cursor=*&debug=true
... I would expect to see all publications from ISSN 1942-7786 published since 1 June 2019.
However, the list includes publication dates before 2019 (like from 2009, from 2010 etc.), and it actually omits publications that should be listed, such as this one: https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1177/1942778620918041 (published 2020).
Is there anything wrong with my query? When I replace
from-pub-date
withfrom-published-date
, the results do not change.By the way, I notice similar issues with other ISSNs as well, so the confusing results do not seem to be grounded in the journal.
Thank you for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: