Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

roscompile as a CI tool #57

Open
DLu opened this issue Nov 8, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

roscompile as a CI tool #57

DLu opened this issue Nov 8, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@DLu
Copy link
Owner

DLu commented Nov 8, 2019

No description provided.

@fmessmer
Copy link

fmessmer commented Jan 9, 2020

I'd be interested in using this feature...I might even be able to contribute here by proposing roscompile as an add-on to industrial_ci...

before I start:

  • what's the status of this repo? maintained? actively developed? EOL?
  • what's the current status wrt CI tool? any effort already invested?

@DLu
Copy link
Owner Author

DLu commented Jan 9, 2020

Hiya @fmessmer.

  • It's actively developed and maintained. I do what I can.
  • No work has been done. I think it depends on Separate Logic for Checking if a change is needed #55 a bit, in that both this and the linter want the ability to flag rule as needed or not. Right now, the interactive mode kinda does that, but by writing the files to the temp file system, which isn't ideal. It may require a re-architecting, which I haven't thought too much about yet.

@130s
Copy link

130s commented Dec 28, 2022

I thought of this idea and ran into this ticket.

It'd be cool if roscompile returns pass/fail based on the rule a user makes, so that it can be used on CI and let it pass/fail.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@fmessmer @DLu @130s