Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM2E Unofficial artifacts: validatedAtLevel, dm2eVersion, stability #63

Open
chrmor opened this issue Mar 4, 2014 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@chrmor
Copy link

chrmor commented Mar 4, 2014

http://data.dm2e.eu/data/html/dataset/uber/dingler/20140304123936384

I see one triple like the following:

?:validatedAtLevel ERROR (xsd:string)

is it an error?

@chrmor chrmor added the dingler label Mar 4, 2014
@kba
Copy link
Member

kba commented Mar 4, 2014

No, it's the unofficial DM2E namespace which has found it's way into the ingestion tool. Will move it to either omnom: or dm2e:

@kba
Copy link
Member

kba commented Mar 4, 2014

I propose to replace them as such

dm2e_unofficial:validatedAtLevel  -> omnom:validatedAtLevel
dm2e_unofficial:stability  -> omnom:stability
dm2e_unofficial:dm2eVersion -> owl:versionInfo

The first two are about describing a dataset, so this is info that the publish service in omnom would generate. Otherwise we should check if prov contains equivalents.

owl:versionInfo is an annotationProperty that is rather vague in its definition so I think we could reuse that.

@kba kba added dm2e-model and removed dingler labels Mar 4, 2014
@kba kba modified the milestone: Model Version 1.1_Rev1.6 Mar 4, 2014
@edroege
Copy link
Member

edroege commented Mar 5, 2014

We also use owl:versionInfo for indicating the model number and revision in the owl file of the model. I guess you want to store the same information there during the ingestion, so I agree. I also think that it is a good idea to move validatedAtLevel and stability into the omnom namespace.

@kba
Copy link
Member

kba commented Mar 6, 2014

OK, but let's do this later so data currently ingested remains valid.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants