-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Storage Account Limitation #41
Comments
We're working around this in main by generating the vm resources in Python. We no longer have the multiple subnet issue, but eliminating the 40 node restriction (or automatically allocating OS disks) would simplify things considerably. |
It sounds like the need to manually specify a storage account for a VM is going away in the future, so this issue will become moot/abstracted away. |
We're expecting the 40 drive storage account limitation to be abstracted away by a future release of vm scalesets. This is not yet available. |
Apparently managed disks will fix this. |
Managed disks are in preview right now. We need to assign someone to testing this. |
Now wondering if the new H series machines will allow us to just sidestep this issue by using ephemeral. |
It seems like the H8 and H16 might end up being our all around choice. The memory is still a bit high, but the disk sizes are good. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/availability-of-h-series-vms-in-microsoft-azure/ |
We're doing a refactor to managed disks on 2/23/17 for OS disks. That should (finally) resolve this. |
We understand that storage accounts have a limit of 40 attached drives. This is forcing us to break nodes over different subnets for clusters greater than 40 nodes and introduces a lot of complexity.
We would really like to see this limitation abstracted away/otherwise removed in Azure as it will simplify the templates substantially.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: