You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
xz offers far better compression than gzip (up to 40% for many sequence files) and decompression is about as fast. Compression is slow, so I only recommend it for long-term files. E.g., I use xz for raw data and final results.
zstd offers compression similar to gzip while using far less CPU time. I recommend this for temporary files.
FWIW, lz4 is even faster than zstd, but does not provide comparable compression. I'm not sure it's worth supporting, but something to consider. zstd CPU time is pretty low, so there isn't much advantage to improving on it in general.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
xz offers far better compression than gzip (up to 40% for many sequence files) and decompression is about as fast. Compression is slow, so I only recommend it for long-term files. E.g., I use xz for raw data and final results.
zstd offers compression similar to gzip while using far less CPU time. I recommend this for temporary files.
FWIW, lz4 is even faster than zstd, but does not provide comparable compression. I'm not sure it's worth supporting, but something to consider. zstd CPU time is pretty low, so there isn't much advantage to improving on it in general.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: