You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I was worried about what exactly represents the output of 'Number of unique reads' in collapsing reads from fastq?
Number of input read 6609696
Number of unique reads 3885326
Number of reads after deduplicating 3028828
Because it seems like the number of unique reads should be similar with number of reads after deduplicating
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Unique reads in this case represents the number of reads with UMIs that are not exactly identical to any other read's UMI. This does not account for errors in the UMIs, which is why the count is greater than the number of reads after deduplicating. The deduplication process allows similar (but not exactly identical) UMIs to be grouped together.
Hi,
I was worried about what exactly represents the output of 'Number of unique reads' in collapsing reads from fastq?
Number of input read 6609696
Number of unique reads 3885326
Number of reads after deduplicating 3028828
Because it seems like the number of unique reads should be similar with number of reads after deduplicating
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: