Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 3, 2024. It is now read-only.

OZMO 930 PRO support? #514

Closed
lollo78 opened this issue Jan 28, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

OZMO 930 PRO support? #514

lollo78 opened this issue Jan 28, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@lollo78
Copy link

lollo78 commented Jan 28, 2024

Question

Hi devs,
I'm a little bit confused about all the ecovacs integrations for Home Assistant found in Google.

For what I've read, the "Home Assistant integration for deebot vacuums" is the killer ones, but I still haven't figured out if my "Ozmo 930 Pro" is supported or not.

Thanks for all your hard work!

Additional information

No response

@lollo78 lollo78 added the question Further information is requested label Jan 28, 2024
@edenhaus
Copy link
Contributor

No this model is currently not supported by this integration

@lollo78
Copy link
Author

lollo78 commented Jan 30, 2024

Thanks,
there is an ETA for it?

@edenhaus
Copy link
Contributor

Nope, as the hole integration was reversed engineered as Ecovacs is not providing any information.
As I don't have your model, I can't help you. You need to analyze the traffic and add the missing parts with a PR :)
The community will say thank you if you do it :)

@edenhaus
Copy link
Contributor

edenhaus commented Feb 1, 2024

Duplicate of #467

@edenhaus edenhaus marked this as a duplicate of #467 Feb 1, 2024
@edenhaus edenhaus closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 1, 2024
@kinower
Copy link

kinower commented Mar 22, 2024

hello,
my home asistant recognises my ozmo 930, it recognises that it is cleaning and the battery, but it does not react to the hoover's commands, I cannot start it or send it to the base.
When I give it a command I get: Service vacuum.turn_on not found.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants