You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm experiencing very high memory requirements with a multiome dataset much smaller than the TAURUS data reported in the manuscript (fig 5). While I appreciate that having paired ATAC and RNA will have higher computation required than RNA only, requiring >1TB seems excessive. Does panpipes have implemented optional strategies to reduce memory requirements that could be useful in this case (e.g. sparse matrix conversion, on disk storage rather than in memory)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @mgrantpeters thanks for reaching out! I agree that the behaviour you observe is rather strange. To help us troubleshoot, could you please let me know:
which integration method are you using?
how many features does your object have? (ATAC and RNA)
thanks!
I'm experiencing very high memory requirements with a multiome dataset much smaller than the TAURUS data reported in the manuscript (fig 5). While I appreciate that having paired ATAC and RNA will have higher computation required than RNA only, requiring >1TB seems excessive. Does panpipes have implemented optional strategies to reduce memory requirements that could be useful in this case (e.g. sparse matrix conversion, on disk storage rather than in memory)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: